Typologia aktywności mieszkańców miast w zakresie ich mobilności

Marcin Świtała; Wiesław Liszewski

doi:10.7409/rabdim.022.020

Published: 2022-12-30

Vol. 21 No. 4 (2022)

Typology of city residents’ activity in terms of their mobility

Marcin Świtała , Wiesław Liszewski

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.7409/rabdim.022.020

Abstract

The article presents the results of research whose main objective was to present typological differentiation of city residents based on their level of mobility. The research attempted to analyze the evolution and differences in mobility – as an expression of preferences for urban travel – among the identified respondent mobility types, taking into account the issues related to decisions on the method and frequency of travel and socio-demographic variables. The nationwide research was conducted on a sample of 1,050 representatives of city population using the quota sampling technique and an electronic survey questionnaire. The research enabled the authors to present a structured classification of five different types of mobility. The group of most active respondents are characterized by the most complex travel chain involving a wide range of transport modes used with high frequency in their usual travels around their cities. The results can be useful in modification of the existing attitudes and habits in the area of mobility behavior and in directing the attention of city residents towards more environmentally friendly solutions. Moreover, the results can also prove helpful to road authorities and policy makers in dealing with decision problems occurring at all stages of infrastructural road projects, especially to those who wish to provide a more user-friendly solutions in the road infrastructure.

Keywords:

mobility, road infrastructure, transport exclusion, typology, urban policy.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Marcin Świtała, Katarzyna Regulska, Life cycle cost analysis as a tool for road infrastructure management – selected issues , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 22 No. 4 (2023)
Agnieszka Łukasiewicz, Marcin Świtała, Differences between the traffic model and the actual road traffic and its structure , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2020)
Agnieszka Łukasiewicz, Marcin Świtała, Ewa Kamińska, Katarzyna Regulska, Sustainable urban mobility and MaaS implementation – selected European and Polish case studies , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 22 No. 3 (2023)
Marcin Świtała, Agnieszka Łukasiewicz, The impact of road investment projects on the economic activity in the light of companies operating in surrounding environment , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 18 No. 4 (2019)
Mariusz Urbański, Marcin Świtała, Wiesław Liszewski, Beata Ślusarczyk, Konrad Piechowicz, Road and bridge construction price indexation illustrated with an example of a selected project , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 21 No. 4 (2022)
Ewa Kamińska, Marcin Świtała, Tomasz Kamiński, Selected issues of the ecobalance analysis of recycled materials used in road construction , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 22 No. 4 (2023)
Marcin Świtała, Renata Cichos-Kabut, Cost-intensity of ground improvement methods in road construction – perspectives of investors and industry enterprises , Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty: Vol. 23 No. 4 (2024)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Świtała, M., & Liszewski, W. (2022). Typology of city residents’ activity in terms of their mobility. Roads and Bridges - Drogi I Mosty, 21(4), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.7409/rabdim.022.020

Cited by / Share

References

Coulter R., van Ham M., Findlay A.M.: New directions for residential mobility research: linking lives through time and space. IZA Discussion Papers, 7525, 2013, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2314820
Google Scholar

Avishai C.: Urban mobility and public transport: future perspectives and review. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 25, 4, 2021, 455-479, DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2020.1799846
Google Scholar

Świtała M., Łukasiewicz A.: Mobilność mieszkańców miast w obliczu pandemii COVID-19. Instytut Badawczy Dróg i Mostów, Seria „S”: Studia i materiały, 92, Warszawa, 2021
Google Scholar

Alke E., Kaczor M., Mokrzański M.: Poradnik w zakresie przeprowadzania ankietowego badania mobilności transportowej ludności. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa, 2018
Google Scholar

Orozco LG.N., Alessandretti L., Saberi M., Szell M., Battiston F.: Multimodal urban mobility and multilayer transport networks. ArXiv:2111.02152 [physics.soc-ph], 2021, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.02152
Google Scholar

Maltese I., Gatta V., Marcucci E.: Active travel in sustainable urban mobility plans. An Italian overview. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 40, ID article 100621, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100621
Google Scholar

Miskolczi M., Földes D., Munkácsy A., Jászberényi M.: Urban mobility scenarios until the 2030s. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, ID article, 103029, 2021, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103029
Google Scholar

Markvica K., Millonig A., Haufe N., Leodolter M.: Promoting active mobility behavior by addressing information target groups: the case of Austria. Journal of Transport Geography, 83, 2020, ID article 102664, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102664
Google Scholar

Urbański M., Sudyka J., Grondys K.: Expert evaluation of road infrastructure management. Roads and Bridges - Drogi i Mosty, 20, 4, 2021, 465-492, DOI: 10.7409/rabdim.021.028
Google Scholar

Diao M., Kong H., Zhao J.: Impacts of transportation network companies on urban mobility. Nature Sustainability, 4, 6, 2021, 494-500, DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00678-z
Google Scholar

Fahimeh G., Yigitcanlar T., Bunker J.: The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15, 10, 2021, 731-748, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1798571
Google Scholar

Butler L., Yigitcanlar T., Paz A.: Smart urban mobility innovations: a comprehensive review and evaluation. IEEE Access, 8, 2020, 196034-196049, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3034596
Google Scholar

Camagni R., Gibelli M.C., Rigamonti P.: Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion. Ecological Economics, 40, 2, 2002, 199-216. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00254-3
Google Scholar

Cao J., Li Q., Wei T., Gao Q., Cao R., Zhong C.: Resolving urban mobility networks from individual travel graphs using massive-scale mobile phone tracking data. Cities, 110, 2021, ID article 103077. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.103077
Google Scholar

Liu C., Chen L., Yuan Q., Wu H., Huang W.: Revealing dynamic spatial structures of urban mobility networks and the underlying evolutionary patterns. International Journal of Geo-Information, 11, 4, 2022, 237, DOI: 10.3390/ijgi11040237
Google Scholar

Zhang F., Wu L., Zhu D., Liu Y.: Social sensing from street-level imagery: a case study in learning spatio-temporal urban mobility pattern. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 153, 2019, 48-58, DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.017
Google Scholar

Alonso-González M.J., Hoogendoorn-Lanser S., van Oort N., Cats O., Hoogendoorn S.: Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – a latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 2020, 378-401, DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022
Google Scholar

Kurniawan J.H., Ong C., Cheah L.: Examining values and influences affecting public expectations of future urban mobility: A Singapore case study. Transport Policy, 66, 2018, 66-75, DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.014
Google Scholar

Louro A., Marques da Costa N., Marques da Costa E.: From Livable Communities to Livable Metropolis: Challenges for urban mobility in Lisbon metropolitan area (Portugal). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 7, 2021, 3525, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073525
Google Scholar

Allam Z., Sharifi A.: Research, structure and trends of smart urban mobility. Smart Cities, 5, 2, 2022, 539-561, DOI: 10.3390/smartcities5020029
Google Scholar

Fahimeh G., Yigitcanlar T., Bunker J.: The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15, 10, 2021, 731-748. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1798571
Google Scholar

International Transport Forum: Travel transitions. How transport planners and policy makers can respond to shifting mobility trends. ITF Research Reports. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2021
Google Scholar

Brzeziński J.: Metodologia badań psychologicznych. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2019
Google Scholar

Basarbowicz K., Dąbrowski A., Filas-Przybył S., Kaźmierczak M., Klimanek T., Orleański M., Pawlikowski D., Stachowiak D., Stawikowska M.: Miasta w liczbach 2016. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa, 2018
Google Scholar

Loukaitou-Sideris A., Wachs M., Pinski M.: Toward a richer picture of the mobility needs of older americans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85, 4, 2019, 482-500, DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2019.1630295
Google Scholar

Świtała M.: Wpływ pandemii COVID-19 na codzienną mobilność mieszkańców Warszawy. Gospodarka Materiałowa i Logistyka, 9, 2021, 19-31, DOI: 10.33226/1231-2037.2021.98.3
Google Scholar

Marcin Świtała

mswitala@ibdim.edu.pl

Affiliation:

Road and Bridge Research Institute, 1 Instytutowa Str., 03-302 Warsaw

Wiesław Liszewski